Evidence beside the claim
Open the exact linked text, highlight the supporting passage and check conditions without switching between unrelated documents.
Give every product claim a traceable path from evidence to independent approval. Keep the statement, its limits and the published version connected as your product changes.
A test result describes a dry, level indoor floor and a speed of 0.5 m/s. Those conditions belong beside the capability.
“Transported 10 kg over 10 metres in each of three trials.”
Synthetic example. No customer or product performance is asserted.A capability statement can outlive the test that supported it. A new product version, an expired source or an omitted condition can change what a team can responsibly publish.
Foundry gives authors and technical reviewers a shared record: the evidence version, the precise claim, the decision and the publication. When linked evidence changes, dependent approvals must be revisited.
Built for product-marketing teams and technical reviewers handling complex product claims.
Five steps, with a retained record at each transition.
Retain source text, a version and the exact passage a claim relies on. Add an expiry date when support is time-limited.
Record the product version, operating conditions and limitations alongside the statement you want to publish.
An authorized reviewer checks the evidence and records a decision. High-risk claims require two independent reviewers.
Publish a snapshot of the current approved claim. Its evidence and decision history remain in the workspace.
Evidence changes, expiry or revocation invalidate dependent approvals. Hosted publications are withdrawn; configured CMS deliveries enter the withdrawal queue.
Open the exact linked text, highlight the supporting passage and check conditions without switching between unrelated documents.
Request evidence analysis, adversarial review, brand feedback or draft wording. AI provides an assessment; an authorized person approves.
Publish the approved snapshot to a hosted claim page. Configured CMS connectors use a delivery queue with visible failures and retries.
Compare review time, correction effort and unsupported approvals against your existing process. Keep visibility observations and commercial outcomes separate from approval decisions.
We do not publish a claimed uplift before we have evidence for it.
Read our measurement approach →Versioned text evidence, scoped claims, independent review, advisory AI jobs, hosted publication, change-triggered re-review and record export. Foundry includes workspace roles, team invitations and owner settings.
Enterprise sign-in, user provisioning and WordPress, Webflow and Contentful connectors are implemented. Each needs customer configuration and acceptance testing before use.
No. It assesses supplied text and can make mistakes. Qualified reviewers remain responsible for source credibility, claim support and applicable requirements.
No. They are synthetic walkthroughs showing how to inspect a claim. They carry no customer performance statistics.
Scope a pilot around a real review process, named reviewers and an agreed publication destination.