01 · Advisory
Evidence analysis
- Reads
- The current claim and its linked evidence versions.
- Returns
- An advisory assessment, reasoning and evidence gaps.
A supported assessment does not constitute approval.
AI assistance
Give each question the right kind of scrutiny.
Four advisory jobs help a team inspect a claim. Each works from the supplied statement and evidence, with its purpose and result recorded.
02 · Advisory
Adversarial review
- Reads
- The same statement, conditions and supporting evidence.
- Returns
- Challenges to unsupported inferences, omitted limits and ambiguous scope.
A reviewer resolves the concerns and records the decision.
03 · Advisory
Brand review
- Reads
- The claim, evidence and an owner-configured brand brief.
- Returns
- Feedback on terminology and clarity while preserving factual limits.
Tone cannot justify a stronger capability claim.
04 · Advisory
Draft suggestion
- Reads
- Evidence, operating conditions and the current statement.
- Returns
- Suggested wording, or no suggestion when the evidence is insufficient.
Accepting a suggestion requires saving a new version and obtaining approval.
Accountable configuration
The job stays explicit when the model changes.
Workspace owners select the provider and model for each job, configure output limits and supply a brand brief where needed. Routing changes are versioned.
A result you can inspect
Run records identify the job, provider, model and routing version. They retain the assessment, reasoning and concerns. A result from an obsolete claim version cannot silently become the current review.
Model names belong in these settings and records so your team can understand how a result was produced.
Data handling and approval boundaries →Start with one claim
Bring the statement. Bring the evidence.
Scope a pilot around a real review process, named reviewers and an agreed publication destination.