Technical claim governance · Evidence, independent review and controlled publication. Inspect capabilities
Industrial robotics · Synthetic example

Keep the test conditions in the promise.

This scenario illustrates a review decision. The evidence, figures and wording are invented for explanation and are not a customer result.

Supplied evidence

In three trials, robot R1 with firmware 2.4 transported 10 kg over 10 metres on a dry, level indoor floor at 0.5 m/s.

Limits of this evidence

Outdoor use, wet surfaces, slopes and safety certification were not assessed.

Proposed statement

The robot carries 100 kg safely in any environment.

Review decision

Hold the original statement. Its load, environment and safety assertions exceed the supplied test result.

A narrower candidate · Not approved

In three indoor trials, R1 firmware 2.4 transported 10 kg over 10 metres on a dry, level floor at 0.5 m/s.

The revised wording still needs an authorized reviewer to inspect the source, scope and intended use. Saving a draft does not approve or publish it.

If the evidence changes

A firmware change needs a new assessment of whether the retained test still supports the claim.