Measure the cost of reaching a decision.
Evaluate review effort and unsupported approvals together.
Before a pilot starts, define the work that consumes time: finding the source, checking scope, resolving a concern, recording approval or updating published material. Use the same boundaries when timing the existing process and the new workflow.
Choose a representative set of claims, including statements the evidence does not support. Ask qualified reviewers to assess support independently. Keep disagreements visible and include correction time in the comparison.
Superlimen’s experiment records accept baseline, treatment and control observations with review time, costs and commercial outcomes. Customers can enter observations directly or import normalized data through an authenticated API. Dedicated CRM and analytics OAuth connectors are not currently included.
A shorter median review time is useful only if approval quality holds up. Report sample size, unsupported approvals and the costs of software, implementation and review. No savings percentage or revenue uplift is promised before it has been measured.